Bob,
I couldn't agree more.
How the poor animal was supposed to survive if it's not allowed to digest something?
Are they trying to protect the food chain? For whom? The Burmese python itself is in the food chain, for heaven's sake.
3 votes
#11.1 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:28 PM EDT
David Rubin Lang
They should just let it go. After all it didn't eat a human being, or a horse, or a pet dog/cat, but a deer.
Deers belong in the food chain while domectic cats or dogs do not.
The Burmese python has every right to be where he is, and naturally had to to digest something to stay alive.
It's cruel and unrational for the Florida wildlife officials to summary take a life of an animals just stop the pythons 'from reaching north.'
How the pythons or other animals are supposed to survive if the cannot hunt and consume other animals as preys? Don't forget all animals in the jungle food chain, including the pythons, are preys.
Although the Burmese python was big alright, but don't discount the possibility that there are other larger animals big enough to swallow this python.
For one, the place he's found looked like a swamp which is a place where the crocodiles roam. Humans should not interfere in the animal world unless we have to. For instance, in Australia there are poisonous toads that pose danger to snakes or crocodiles if the toads are eatent.
I once watched an African elephant which got separated from its herds and attacked and eaten by a group of lions in a movie. Later the filmmaker commented that much as he pitied the pachyderm, he felt interference was not warranted as it was an animal things. Animals killed by animals. If the elephant was victimized by a human being was a different story he said.
I couldn't agree more.
But in this case, the Burmese python just hunted and killed a deer which is his natural food.
I hope in future wildlife officials are more restrained; so that all life forms can survive.
2 votes
#12 - Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:12 PM EDT
No comments:
Post a Comment